Home
About
Disease Areas
HIV
Sexually transmitted disease
Adolescent health
Viral hepatitis
Tuberculosis
Tools
All Tools
Projected Percentage Reductions in TB Incidence, 2016-2025 for key populations in California, Florida, New York and Texas
teen-SPARC
State-Level Heterogeneity of Tuberculosis Incidence by Risk Factor in the United States
Estimates of Persons with Indications for Preexposure Prophylaxis (PrEP)
Impact of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis among MSM in the United States
News & Media
Downloads
Publications
CME
Contact
Search
Home
Projects
Item Details Page
Viral Suppression in the United States - Medical Monitoring Project and NA-ACCORD
Bradley H,Althoff K,Buchacz K,McKenney J,Prejean J,Paz-Bailey G,Shouse R,Brooks J,Rosenberg E
Annals of Epidemiology | November 22, 2018
Purpose:
To assess sampling bias in national viral suppression (VS) estimates derived from the Medical Monitoring Project (MMP) resulting from use of an abbreviated (four-month) annual sampling period. We aimed to improve VS estimates using cohort data from the North American AIDS Cohort Collaboration on Research and Design (NA-ACCORD) and a novel cohort-adjustment method.
Methods:
Using full calendar years of NA-ACCORD data, we assessed timing of HIV care attendance (inside versus exclusively outside MMP’s four-month sampling period), VS status at last test (<200 vs. ?200 copies/mL), and associated demographics. These external estimates were used to standardize MMP to NA-ACCORD data with multivariable regression models of care attendance and VS , yielding adjusted 2009–2013 VS estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results:
Weighted percentages of VS among persons in HIV care were 67% in 2009 and 77% in 2013. These estimates are slightly lower than previously published MMP estimates (72% and 80% in 2009 and 2013, respectively). The number of persons receiving HIV care was previously underestimated by 20% because patients receiving care exclusively outside the MMP sampling period did not contribute toward the weighted population estimate.
Conclusions:
Careful examination of national surveillance estimates using data triangulation and novel methodologies can improve the robustness of VS estimates.
Read Article
Downloadable Files:
FY5_OnePager_Bradley_MMP_BW.pdf
FY5_OnePager_Bradley_MMP_Color.pdf